Comments on: Glenn Beck: Global Warming greatest scam in history

By: chief294

chief294 — Sat, 03 May 2008 03:22:45 +0000

Perhaps he doesn't want to get his point across less aggressively.
Also I couldn't find 'properganda' entered in my dictionary so I was unable to follow your advice and look up said word.

By: Winningjob

Winningjob — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:24:14 +0000

You are a disgrace to the broadcast arts Glenn Beck. You are smug, use top of the head details and possibly stories and do very little research yourself. I used to be a fan of yours, but coming from a family that works in television we see what you have become and now this LIE about James von Brunn being a hero to 911 truthers has really put you out there. BYE BYE RATINGS.

By: silverfencer

silverfencer — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:32:41 +0000

Thats interesting, how very nice of you to attack my spelling and not my argument.

Perhaps you might have something useful to contribute other than a spell checker?

By: silverfencer

silverfencer — Sun, 27 Apr 2008 05:46:59 +0000

Also perhaps in summary of your argument, just while you have your dictionary handy, you should also look up the word "petty." I think it fits nicely.

By: Ingenue001

Ingenue001 — Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:50:16 +0000

the free market knows what it is doing. no one would buy hurricane supplies 6 months before because serious hurricanes might hit once a decade in an area at most. My dad has a generator for hurricanes… he's never used it. What a waste of money? He's 85, he'll never use it. Why waste time and energy preparing for things unlikely to happen? We have enough real concerns.

By: BeondaPale

BeondaPale — Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:31:59 +0000

You obviously don't live along the gulf coast

By: drumz0r

drumz0r — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:25:11 +0000

For all the uninformed people who think it's a scam (don't even need to go there right now), let's look at this how it really is: Nobody, no individuals, are actually DOING anything about it, so whether it's happening or not, it's certainly not ruining anyone's lives anyway. Pros: the government raises standards on emissions, our normal lifestyles have been altered to REDUCE needless waste and consumerism, cars are being designed to be more efficient, list goes on.. Are any of these bad things?

By: drumz0r

drumz0r — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 05:20:35 +0000

Also, is this John Coleman ******* seriously mocking ALL of the learned, qualified research scientists around the world, saying that they ALL contrive their conclusions based on some agenda? He's a journalist, a TV personality, an entrepreneur and just because he *founded* the Weather Channel (also was forcibly removed as CEO within a year) doesn't mean **** and sure as hell doesn't make him qualified to talk about any of the actual research that is going on. Talk to someone who knows something.

By: Ingenue001

Ingenue001 — Wed, 16 Apr 2008 11:10:26 +0000

academics constantly engage in "scams". how well did communism work? go to any ivy league 30 years ago and majority of professors were marxist. collective stupidity must be fought! a good book is the "myth of heterosexual aids"… much science is politically motivated.

By: Ingenue001

Ingenue001 — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 13:29:02 +0000

CAFE standards already helped take down GE and chrysler. Global warming scam has already cost hundreds of billions… if not trillions.